RESUMEN
Background: The role of myeloid cells in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 is well established, in particular as drivers of cytokine production and systemic inflammation characteristic of severe COVID-19. However, the potential for myeloid cells to act as bona fide targets of productive SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. Method(s): Using anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs with a range of neutralisation potencies and binding specificities, we performed a detailed assessment of mAb-mediated infection of monocytes/macrophages. THP-1 cells were used as a model system, with results confirmed in primary macrophages. Result(s): Infection of THP-1 cells was seen via mAbs targeting the spike RBD, but not with those targeting the NTD or S2 subunit. mAbs with the most consistent potential to mediate infection targeted a conserved region of the RBD (group 1/class IV). No infection was seen with the same quantity of virus but in the absence of antibody, and pre-treating the cells with FcgammaRI and -II blocking antibodies inhibited infection. Thus, antibody-FcR interactions are able to expand the tropism of SARS-CoV-2. Time-course studies demonstrated high-level and productive infection. Studies performed in human iPSC-derived macrophages and primary monocyte-derived macrophages paralleled results seen in THP-1 cells but with lower infection levels. Up to 2% of macrophages were infected, with infected cells appearing multinucleated and syncytial. Addition of ruxolitinib, an inhibitor of JAK1/2 signalling, increased infection up to 10-fold, indicating limitation of infection through innate immune mechanisms. Sera from primary infections (n=80) mediated rare infection events, with a minority of samples (n=3) promoting significant infection. Competition assays confirmed results seen in sera, with the addition of neutralising mAbs diminishing the infection seen with infection-mediating mAbs. Thus, the presence of antibodies with potential to mediate infection is not sufficient to predict myeloid cell infection, rather, the context in which the antibodies are produced is key. Conclusion(s): We hypothesise that a nascent antibody response during peak viral replication in primary infection presents a window of opportunity for myeloid cells to become infected, while establishment of a robust polyclonal response via vaccination or prior infection reduces the likelihood of this occurring. Infection via antibody-FcR interactions could contribute to pathogenesis in primary infection, systemic virus spread or persistent infection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) SARS-CoV-2 lateral-flow antigen detection (LFD) testing in the emergency department (ED) could inform rapid infection control decisions but requirements for safe deployment have not been fully defined. METHODS: Review of LFD test results, laboratory and POC-RT-PCR results and ED-performance metrics during a two-week high SARS-CoV-2 prevalence period followed by several months of falling prevalence. AIM: Determine whether LFD testing can be safely deployed in ED to provide an effective universal SARS-CoV-2 testing capability. FINDINGS: 93% (345/371) of COVID-19 patients left ED with a virological diagnosis during the 2-week universal LFD evaluation period compared to 77% with targeted POC-RT-PCR deployment alone, on background of approximately one-third having an NHS Track and Trace RT-PCR test-result at presentation. LFD sensitivity and specificity was 70.7% and 99.1% respectively providing a PPV of 97.7% and NPV of 86.4% with disease prevalence of 34.7%. ED discharge-delays (breaches) attributable to COVID-19 fell to 33/3532 (0.94%) compared with the preceding POC-RT-PCR period (107/4114 (2.6%); p=<0.0001). Importantly, LFD testing identified 1 or 2 clinically-unsuspected COVID-19 patients/day. Three clinically-confirmed LFD false positive patients were appropriately triaged based on LFD action-card flowchart, and only 5 of 95 false-negative LFD results were inappropriately admitted to non-COVID-19 areas where no onward-transmission was identified. LFD testing was restricted to asymptomatic patients when disease prevalence fell below 5% and detected 1-3 cases/week. CONCLUSION: Universal SARS-CoV-2 LFD testing can be safely and effectively deployed in ED alongside POC-RT-PCR testing during periods of high and low disease prevalence.